Voyeurism or genuine news?

In the wake of the recent disasters, both here and round the the world, can I ask whether people think that the news coverage of them has slipped from genuine news coverage and into voyeurism? It seems that the first thing that television stations do now when something catastrophic happens is pack off their highest profile newspeople to the disaster scene. Aren’t the local reporters good enough? Why do I need it personalised by having it covered by a familiar face? Seriously, what does Grant Denier crying at the scene add to my understanding of what is happening? Or is it just ‘good television’?

Coverage of these events is crucial, without doubt, for a whole number of reasons but do we really need our news providers thrusting themselves into the middle of people’s grief? I personally find it offensive.

Have a read of this article and the range of comments from people. Maybe it is time we asked our news providers to do just that…provide the news.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s